This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
The ‘ No. 4 overall pick of the 2016 has been widely speculated as an opportunity for the club to draft ‘s eventual succe sor at quarterback, but NFL Media senior analyst Gil Brandt says taking a QB with that pick isn’t part of the ‘ plan.And few are as well-informed on the subject than the former general manager who spoke directly with club Juventus Jersey owner Jerry Jones.”Jerry told me recently that he will unequivocally not take a quarterback at No. 4, where the draft this year. I believe him,” Brandt wrote in a for the in the draft. “It makes sense if you think Romo will make a full recovery from offseason surgery, will be your starter for at least three more years, and your team has a window of opportunity that will remain open by filling more glaring needs with the top pick in the draft.”That would certainly align with Jones’ declaration at the Reese’s that the club to find its next starting quarterback in the draft. head coach Jason Garrett has also said that, while the club on the roster, the No. 4 pick might not be the time to make that investment. Brandt finds Jones’ intent to go in another direction with the No. 4 pick sensible.”It’s not only a smart move, but I believe it’s the only move, as tempting as it might be if a player like is still on the board when the pick,” Brandt wrote. “If I were Jerry, I’d wait on my quarterback in the later rounds, develop him, and let him learn from Romo. It’s a luxury Dallas can afford.”That could be good news for the second tier of pa sing prospects — one extra team in the second-day (Rounds 2-3) or third-day (Rounds 4-7) market for a quarterback can’t hurt.For the likes of Wentz or Cal’s , however, falling past Dallas might mean falling quite a bit farther.*Follow Chase Goodbread on Twitter *.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.