This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by 
-
Posts
-
<br> Binance offers an extensive range of coins/tokens for deposit and withdrawal, including GBP, BTC, and XRP. If it succeeds, that means Binance, which now offers only crypto-to-crypto trading pairs, will be able to offer crypto-to-fiat trading pairs. These reviews guide the traders find the best Bitcoin broker for trading the digital currency. It’s really hard to find a good reputation algorithm that would seem to work. If you have another Lightning-like channel specification that you coded up or a custom channel type, you can also include that in this channel announcement and it will just work. ● LN simplified commitments: in two separate threads, developers of LND discussed their work on implementing simplified commitments, which are LN settlement transactions that only pay a minimal onchain transaction fee and which contain two additional outputs (one for each party). Do you remember that Selectric printer I had back in first year at UW (the one we used to type out our entry in the shortest APL program contest)? And we’ve always gone back and forth between those, because we don’t know if we should do a simpler version first and wait for later to do a much more complex version, or if we should just jump to the more complex version right now. Those are the two I know of. Whenever new transactions are confirmed and added to the ledger, the network updates every user’s copy of the ledger to reflect the latest changes. Credit cards never anticipated online transactions. Credit cards offer a line of interest-free credit (loan) that is usually billed once a month. So, it’s really hard to figure out where to draw the line here. I don’t know. That’s up to people to figure out, I guess. So the one, Bastien, you’re talking about, I think that’s spear actually. This is a very easy way to solve fast jamming, but the issue is that it has an impact on normal users as well, because if you’re a normal user, you try to make payments, you have a lot of failures before you actually get to the recipient, you will have paid upfront fees for failures that you may think are not your fault, not something you should be <br>n<br>or.
And they’re going to be tweaked at every hop, which means that even if you have multiple nodes that are on the path of the same payment, it’s not going to be payment hash, you’re going to see a different point, a different secret than in both nodes. There’s another one that’s much simpler that just lets you add another secret and add an additional round trip between the recipient and the sender, and this is the same thing as a stepless payment. That’s Marc Andreessen again. So basically that’s the idea here, right? That’s why we’re not doing that right now, and that’s why most people will just keep announcing the output that really corresponds to the channel so that when it gets spent, people actually notice it and m.blog.naver.com can remove it from that graph and know that they cannot route through that channel anymore. We don’t know exactly how we would do that, those proofs, and how we would make sure that those proofs cannot be reused, how we would track channel closing differently than just watching onchain. And for this, one of the promising solutions is to use local reputation, where you track how much fee revenue every one of your peers has generated for you in the past, and you only allocate them liquidity bandwidth for something that would lose less than what they made you earn <br>h<br>ast basically.
So, will we need to be keeping track of the UTXO actually not being moved while it is the stand-in to have announced the channel? So, this is a very nice improvement and it also opens the door to creating more things on top of normal payments like redundant overpayments. But with these both redundant overpayments and also with the stepless payment, basically we first establish the contract and once we get a response from the recipient that they have received sufficient parts of the contract, we would only then exchange the secret; and once they have the secret, we can exchange the secret in a form in which they are only allowed to pull in enough payments. Mike Schmidt: Next section from the Summit discussed PTLCs and redundant overpayments. This is included in the second release candidate for Bitcoin Core 0.20 linked in the preceding section. You can’t tell if Alice gave money to C or D, even if you know she owns A. Technical implementation of bitcoin mixing services can take several forms. We’ve spoken previously, over maybe six months a bunch of different times, about different kinds of channel jamming attacks: liquidity jamming attacks, which exhaust the capacities in channels; and HTLC jamming attacks, where the attacker attempts to take all the HTLC slots with a<br>ch of small payments.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.